Seventy questions, four options each, two hours. Technique will not rescue you if you do not know the material, but poor technique loses marks you have already earned.
A well-written multiple-choice examination is not a guessing game, and the NABCEP paper is well written. The three wrong options are not random: each one is the answer you would reach by making a specific, predictable mistake. Learning to recognise those mistakes is worth real marks.
In a calculation question you can usually expect: the right answer; the answer you get if you drop or invert a sign; the answer you get if you forget to apply a correction factor; and the answer you get if you confuse two units. That is why the option that "looks about right" so often is not. If your working lands exactly on one of the offered numbers, that is weak evidence you are correct — the wrong numbers were chosen precisely because people land on them.
Temperature coefficients are negative. Temperature differences below standard test conditions are also negative. Multiplying two negatives gives a positive, so voltage goes up as it gets colder. Candidates who rush this produce a lower voltage, find that number in the options, and move on satisfied. The worked example is here →
"Maximum" and "minimum" usually signal that a correction factor applies — maximum voltage means coldest temperature, maximum current means hottest. "At standard test conditions" means do not correct anything. "Continuous" in a conductor question means the ampacity derating applies. "Nominal" is a label, not a measurement. Each of those words is doing work, and skipping over it is how a candidate who knows the material answers a different question from the one asked.
There is no negative marking, so never leave a question blank. If you must guess, eliminate on units and order of magnitude first — an answer three orders of magnitude from plausible is a distractor for somebody who dropped a kilo prefix, and you can discard it without any calculation at all.
Technique is learned on questions, not on pages about questions. Three worked examples with full reasoning are published free, and the full bank is 140 questions with the working on video at $210 CAD. The question bank →
No. Answer every question; a blank scores the same as a wrong answer and you forgo the chance of being right.
Two hours for seventy questions is roughly a minute forty each. Flag the slow ones and come back rather than spending six minutes on one.
Not tricky. Precise. The wrong options are the answers produced by specific common mistakes, which is a fair way to test whether you avoided them.
Yes. For people already working in solar it is often the only thing worth buying.
Related
Enrol
No consultation call, no quote, no sales sequence. The prices are on the site and the seats are on the calendar.